GLEW'S NEWS BLOG

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Optomechanical Engineering Considerations for Space Instruments

  
  
  
  
  

Astronauts and solar panels in space.  When designing optical instruments for space vehicles, one must take specific into account certain considerations, to ensure successful performance capabilities. This blog hopes to introduce the following: (1) the importance of material selection; (2) environmental considerations; and (3) challenges that optomechanical engineering teams encounter.

Effective engineering design of optical instruments requires advance knowledge of the adverse environments under which the product is expected to successfully operate, e.g.  temperature, pressure, vibration, shock, moisture, corrosion, contamination, fungus, abrasion, erosion, and high radiation. These all can affect the performance of optical instruments and their useful life cycle in space and elsewhere. The optomechanical engineer must carefully select the materials to maximize environmental resistance, in order to ensure the proper operation of the product over the expected useful lifetime.  Often an optomechanical engineer relies on the combined skills of an engineering team composed of other specialists.  Mechanical engineers may perform FEA to determine stress and vibration; electrical engineers may help design the controls and electronics.  Materials scientists and materials engineers help to specify and test the materials of design.  Ocassionally, one even finds a use for a physicist.

Environmental conditions in space vary widely, and may be severe.  In the extreme conditions of space, optical instruments must be able to survive without progressive deterioration or permanent damage, yet still perform in accordance with project specifications. Therefore, defining the expected environment of the optical instruments in space as well as under launch, operating, storage and transportation logistics are absolutely critical. All conditions must be managed as early in the design phase as possible to ensure appropriate provisions are made.

Space provides a harsh environment that challenges scientists, and engineers to meet design optical payload requirements in this type of environment. Various environments exist for operation, storage, and transportation of flight hardware such as optical systems. In a controlled environment, such as a laboratory, the product would have a different set of conditions than a system designed for the military, or space flight.

One common mistake novice optomechanical engineering teams make when designing for space is to neglect the vacuum of space. Human beings are used to atmospheric pressure of 101 kPa (14.7 psi) and 21% oxygen. Astronauts require this ambient pressure, but it creates an internal pressure on a space vehicle. The pressure differentials can cause fractures or deformations in the structure, loss of hardware functionality, even explosions, not to mention millions of dollars lost on the project.

An example of this is an optomechanical engineering team forgot to take pressure differentials into account when design a portion of a satellite. One of the multi layer insulation blankets came loose and covered up most of the optical mirror. This essentially took away most of the satellite’s vision and resulted in limited data retrieval.

Space is the final frontier and represents a myriad of unknowns that can compromise space vehicles used for human exploration. Optomechanical engineering personnel must attempt to account for all of the conditions that could affect their optical instruments, or risk damaged equipment and million dollars wasted. 

For more information on Glew Engineering Consulting visit the Glew Engineering website, blog or call 800-877-5892 or 650-641-3019. 

Comments

There are no comments on this article.
Comments have been closed for this article.

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Linear v Novellus (Semiconductor Equipment)

  
  

After 8 long years, Novellus finally rid itself of the lawsuit with Linear Technology. Irell and Manella LLP, for whom Glew Engineering has worked in the past, took no prisoners in the unanimous jury verdict announced yesterday in favor of their client Novellus.  The jury consisted of 12 men and women in Santa Clara, CA, the heart of the silicon valley.  Certainly good news for Novellus' legal team, as well as their bottom line. Congratulation to Jonathan Kagan Esq. and his colleagues.  Now both sides can get back to what they do best - making chips and chip equipment.

Novellus' also shipped their 1000th Vector PECVD tool in February? Considering the tool's throughput and uptime, there may be as many chips out there by now with Novellus' dielectric films as those of any semiconductor equipment manufacturer. See the details at: 

http://ir.novellus.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=441840

 

Semiconductor Equipment, Glew Engineering

All Posts

Follow Glew Engineering

Browse by Tag

Subscribe by Email

Your email: